|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
|
Korean Subway Riding for
Dummies Sitting down in a subway car in Korea
is a rare experience, especially for the feeble-minded. Common etiquette designates that you give up
your seat to elders, the disabled, and women.
If you are not part of this demographic, ball up and stand.
Rush hour, though. Rush hour dissolves all morality. It is the great equalizer. It is getting stranded on an island, except
not like getting stranded on an island because islands are not as crowded. In any case, all people are brought down to
their animal instincts. It is the moment
of impending death. It is during this
time that sitting is essential for your subway riding experience. Standing and
holding onto the handles isn’t so terrible, but actually it is. Sitting is supreme.
During rush hour, you are squashed
against the businessman next to you, the girl with too much make-up. And just when you think the car can’t
possibly fit in more people, AUGH more just did. If you’re lost in the middle of the crowd
somewhere, chances are you won’t be near a pole or a hand strap and you have to
hold on to the sweaty man next to you.
Sometimes it’s so crowded you get pasted to the glass window on the
door, and you get pushed out as soon as the doors open for the next stop. Commuters waiting at the stop will try to get
in before you have a chance to get back on.
If you are especially feeble you might get stranded at a random stop and
you’ll have to squeeze your way onto the next train.
Compare this with getting a
seat. The space above you is free, and
you can lean your head on the window behind you and fall asleep. And since no one ever commits the great
crime of trying to squeeze in more people in the row (there are designated
curves on the seats for a specific amount of butts) thigh room is ample.
Before we discuss tips on how to get a
seat on the subway, there are few ideas you need to get ingrained in your
head.
The Basics
This Is No Time To Be Nice. As
I said, it doesn’t occur to Korean people that it might be common courtesy to
let the people exiting the subway walk out first. In fact, it doesn’t occur to them that they
should practice any good manners at all.
So if you want your Korean subway experience to be a pleasant one, you
need to do as the Romans do. Be
extremely aggressive and assassinate Caesar if you have to.
Carpe Seat. In each of ten cars, there are forty-two
seats. That may seem like a lot, but it’s nothing compared to the number of
commuters. Never assume that other
people will get up at the next stop. Now
is your only chance in the world.
Understand the Rules
of Claiming Etiquette. The seats are
all arranged along the side of the car, in between doors. If someone is standing in front of a seat and
that seat becomes available, you’d better burn off your own eyes before
thinking about taking it. That person
has claimed the seat as his own. Korean
people are very particular about this.
So. You must “claim” seats on
your own. Stand in front of a potential
seat, and wait there until it becomes available.
How to Get a Seat
Location, location,
location. It’s everything. Your best bet is to stand right smack in the
middle of a seating section and hover around as many people as you can. If you are near a door, your claiming
abilities are severely limited, since you'll only be able to claim that coveted
corner seat. Plus, without fail, you
will notice that when the corner seat opens up, the person sitting next to the
corner seat will shift over immediately so that they are not in between two
people. Without fail. So hover around the middle of the row. Take a wide stance; claim at least three
people. Don’t let anyone come into your
space.
Use the stop-and-go’s
of the subway to your advantage.
Exaggerate your swaying at stops, and try to claim more than the
standard three seats. You don’t want
anyone claiming seats next to you. If
you are wearing a backpack, stand sideways, and fall down on the ground
occasionally.
Claim people who are
alert. This is just common
sense. Don’t be so foolish as to stand
near people who are sleeping. Let the
sleeping people be – they like where they are, and they won’t get up. I can’t tell you how many times I myself have
fallen asleep on the subway, missed my stop, and not regretted it at all.
Avoid old people. They only ride subways if they are traveling
for more than an hour. If one of the
seats you’ve claimed next to the old person happens to open up, you wouldn’t
honestly enjoy sitting next to the geezer, anyway, would you? Your answer should be no, I’d hate it. I hate old people. This is no time to be nice.
Look for middle and
high school students. If you can
stand the smell, that is. They are
marked by white school uniforms. They
are bratty, and tend to grab a seat even if their stop is next. You’ll rarely see a young student travel for
more than 10 minutes at a time.
Avoid thirty-something
to middle-aged women. They have no
shame. They disregard all of the rules
of claiming etiquette. They will tear
you to pieces. Don’t be fooled by the
decoys they carry around, which they call infants. They are manipulative, and will not lose a
fight – avoiding them is the best way to deal with them.
As a last resort,
stare pretty young women down. They
may get freaked out and get up.
Otherwise, they could be flattered and you’d have yourself a date for
Friday night.
Advanced tip:
Get into a car which is
strategic for commuters to transfer to other lines. Most commuters are experienced enough to get
into the car that will let them walk the quickest path to the next train, so
they are likely to get up frequently.
| | |
|
Three Butler
Buddies
From "Dennis
J Lee (dennisl@Princeton.EDU)" <dennisl@Princeton.EDU>
Sent Friday,
August 5, 2005 5:29 am
To cuga@princeton.edu
Subject Welcome
to the Class of 2009!
Hello!
This summer, I've used the phrase, "Nanda goreh!!!" many times,
because sometimes that's all one can say.
I am welcoming you to the potentially great class of 2009! You are
undoubtedly more intelligent than I am, but that doesn't mean you are smarter
than me. Actually, yes it does. You are smarter than me.
If you're confused, so am I. There's apparently some sort of new program
called Butler Buddies. I got assigned some people to email, so that you
would be all excited about coming to Princeton.
Um. A little about myself, I am a sophomore, and i don't have a
major. I like music and sports. My name is Dennis.
I don't know anything about you, except that I can guess you are Japanese
American, or Japanese. If you aren't, then that is bacca on my part to
assume such a thing. But I'm supposed to encourage you and get you
excited for the school year! Hooray!
Princeton is awesome. REally. The tone of
this email may not give you that feeling, but it is awesome, in case you didn't
know. Butler is not so
awesome, in case you didn't know. You happen to be in 1942, which
has a one computer cluster, but not much else. I was in 1940 last year,
which is the same as 1942, except it has one less computer cluster.
Really, the dorms aren't bad at all. I liked my room a lot.
Princeton is awesome because of the girls.
They're all so unappealing, all men can study. I'm only
kidding, of course. Not everyone studies.
What you will find is that everyone around you is amazing. They'll be
normal, and then all of a sudden they'll reveal retractable claws, or something
ridiculously amazing. One of my best friends is an origami expert.,
and another friend got 11th place in the National Spelling Bee. And
you're Japanese! Which is amazing in itself, so you've got a head start.
Most people find their niche at Princeton at some point
or another. That is when Princeton becomes
awesome. The first semester is a lot of getting used to, friends,
studying, food, blah, and if you are an engineer, you learn new skills like,
how to rejoice over a B.
This is the most unorganized, horrible welcoming letter. I
apologize. I have too many paragraphs.
Okay well, I don't really know what to say, other than, Princeton
is the place to be. I didn't want to go to college last year, but
now it's my home, and I'd be afraid to leave it.
Please, please, email me back with any questions you have, or if I offended you
in any way, let me know. If you want to know about campus
groups, majors, or any kind of boring little thing, let me
know. ARight Cuga. That could be your nickname next
year, if it already isn't.
Dennis Lee
From "Dennis
J Lee (dennisl@Princeton.EDU)" <dennisl@Princeton.EDU>
Sent Friday,
August 5, 2005 6:01 am
To dsassaro@princeton.edu
Subject Princeton Class of 2009
Hello David. I know
nothing about you, except that your last name could potentially be dangerous,
because it starts with Sass. I'm sure it makes for some annoying
jokes. I am your Butler Buddy, which some people might cleverly change to
But Buddy, but that is really not appropriate, so I will not talk about
that.
So Dave Sassaroli is in the butt. I bet they got a kick out of
that. No worries! Butler
is widely known as the worst residential college in terms of niceness, but Walker
is probably the best dorm building in Butler.
I think you're gonna be living right next to my dorm - I'm in 322.
I won't really tell you much about myself, just in case you decide you don't
really feel like being friends with me, which I totally understand.
I wouldn't normally want to be friends with anyone who signed up to send out
emails to incoming freshmen, because those people are usually the most fake and
annoying people. Actually no, I am just thinking of the girl that
made me sign up and do this. She told me that I would only have to write
one letter, but they ended up giving me three. figures.
Since I have three But buddies, this may make you think that you are not
special, but you know you are because you are going to Princeton.
Princeton is amazing because everyone seems pretty
normal until you learn that your roommate once stole 8 pounds of popcorn from the dining hall.
That would be me, of course. I guess it's nothing to brag about since you
are undoubtedly more intelligent than me, but I have had my
moments. Honestly, Princeton becomes
better and better the more you spend time here. School became
fun when I came back from fall break and winter break, because it felt like
coming home.
You'll meet my roommates and me next year, and they are 20 times cooler than I
am, so that's a relief.
This could be one of the worst welcome letters to Princeton,
so just email me back any questions you have, or if i have offended you in
anyway, let me know. Im not sure if you want to know about boring
things like majors, classes, food, facilities and such. I also dont know
what type of person you are, so I am careful not to make politically incorrect
statements againts gays, or use swear words, such as fuck.
Yeah, so throw me back an email with any questions. I hope you're excited
for next year.
Dennis Lee '08
From "Dennis
J Lee (dennisl@Princeton.EDU)" <dennisl@Princeton.EDU>
Sent Friday,
August 5, 2005 6:17 am
To mhcheng@princeton.edu
Subject Class of
2009
Hello, Matt
I am your Butler
Buddy. I am
supposed to welcome you into Princeton, with warm
remarks and encouraging rhetoric.
I don't know anything about you, but I can tell you that you are
probably a hell of a lot smarter than I am. If you aren't, you at
least have a higher self-esteem at this point. But let me
tell you, Princeton is amazing. It is home.
Of course it is not to you yet, but it soon will be. And then you will be
ours.
Honestly, I think it's weird and annoying that I have to send an email to
you. You are the last of three students that I am sending a letter to, so
by this time I am tired. I'm usually not this weird when I write,
but I you are not a real person to me, so I'm having a little fun.
But alas, you are real person, and you will be living very close to
me. I'm in 322 Walker, with
three other white dudes. They're about 20 times cooler than me.
I'll only tell you a little about myself, in case you decide you don't want to
be friends with me. which is completely understandable.
I'm not a big fan of asian pride either.
Speaking of Asians, one of my other But Buddies is Japanese.
There are hardly any on campus, so I'm excited to meet him. I've heard so
much about Japanese people. Did you ever sing that little jingle in
Elementary school? "Bacca bacca chin chin....to you!"
I like sports and music. I also like the store Target.
By the way, if you want to know any boring stuff, like classes, majors,
professors, food, facilities, shoot me back an email and I will inform you
about those things.
Butler is widely known as the worst
of the 5 residential colleges, but don't worry, Walker
isn't so bad. You'll soon find that it's probably the best location on
campus, too.
When I just got out of high school, I really didn't feel like going to college,
but it's truly awesome. You can walk outside naked at 4 am and no one will say anything to you. Not that
that's the only plus, but you know, whatever you're into.
I'd like to give you advice on things, but I don't know what type of person you
are or anything. I don't know whether you are geeky, ghetto,
spikyhaired, fobby, awesome, quiet, or loud. I myself am relatively
a geek, even though I don't play computer games.
If I have offended you in anyway, or you have any questions,
please please please email me back and i will shoot you a reply as soon as I
can.
Cheers
Dennis Lee '08
| | |
| I liked Juno better.
Michael Clayton
Near the end of the film, the title
character, played by George Clooney, drives his son Henry back home from a
relative’s house. The car ride is seen
from a nerve-wracking angle, as if they could crash at any moment. Clooney’s expression is angry and vacant at
the same time. All of a sudden, he stops
the car, and looks straight at Henry. “…You’re not going to be one of these
people that goes through life wondering why shit is falling out of the sky
around them. I know that. I know it. OK? I
see it every time I look at you. I see
it right now. I don’t know where you got
it from, but you got it. OK?” Frustration, anger, uncertainty, and love are
all harnessed into a subtle, weary gleam in his eyes – and it’s downright
spooky.
Michael Clayton is a special type
of attorney called a “fixer,” dealing with clients’ screw-ups and
scandals. Arthur Edens, the head defense attorney for agricultural giant U/North,
is faced with a dilemma: a contaminant in his client’s weed-killer product is
responsible for the death of 468 farmers, and he’s the only one that knows
about it. The combination of Edens’s
guilt and his bipolarity turns him berserk during a deposition, where he strips
naked and proclaims his love for one of the plaintiffs. Clayton’s job, then, is to cover that up, to make sure that U/North still
has the upper hand. So Edens’s
burden is transferred to him. And when
Karen Crowder, chief counsel of U/North, finds out that Edens (and now,
Clayton) possesses a document that would ruin her company, she takes decisive,
even violent, action.
Pretty simple, right? If you tried to figure it out the plot
yourself, though, the movie might have passed you by and you would have missed
some of the best writing in recent years.
Screenwriter and director Tony Gilroy is shrewdly self-aware – his
Bourne scripts haven’t exactly been centered on dialogue. So while his last screenplay started with a
suspenseful chase, Gilroy’s
directorial debut starts with a fervent Edens
monologue that provides the thematic lens for the film. “Is
this me? Am I this freak organism that’s been sent here to sleep and eat and
defend this one horrific chain of carcinogenic molecules? Is that my destiny, is that my fate? Is that it, Michael? Is that my grail? Is that the correct answer to the multiple
choice of me?” The camera focuses
on nothing in particular: an empty room, a janitor, a stack of papers. It’s a declaration: this isn’t a flashy action
flick, so pay attention.
Careful, cerebral, and eloquent dialogue in a film is pervasive, and it
enhances every aspect of it – the scenery, the silences, and in Michael
Clayton’s case, the ambiguous expressions on George Clooney’s face. I don’t mean to discount Clooney’s sublime
performance, but with the lines like he has, who could have messed this up? When the end credits start to pulsate on the
lower right corner of the screen, the camera focuses on his eyes. He stares out into space as his taxi drives
him aimlessly around New York City. This goes on for two minutes;
those two minutes give moviegoers enough time to, first, realize that the movie
is over, second, internalize how bad-ass that last scene was, and third, reconsider
the moral dilemma Michael Clayton may or may not have won.
The film’s power comes not from
any moral victory, but from its careful, profound portrayal of a man struggling
in today’s corporate world. “You can’t
just suddenly stop and say ‘that’s it, game over, I’m into miracles.’ ” And its essentially unmarketable title
emphasizes that the movie isn’t about making the right decisions or about
beating the enemy, whoever that may be.
The focus is quite literally Michael Clayton, who is human, modern,
multi-dimensional, and aching inside. | | |
| It's cheating, I know, but I haven't written much lately.
Stanford Application Essay
“Simplify, simplify, simplify,” intoned Thoreau. If you were
to follow Thoreau’s advice and scale back your possessions, what would you
keep, and why?
For one, I would keep my
toothbrush.
Firstly, I hate morning
breath. I’d say to “multiply, multiply,
multiply” toothbrushes so that no one will ever again reek of it.
Secondly, taking care of teeth just
makes sense. Any one of those tiny
advice books you see near the cash register at bookstores will tell you to
brush your teeth often. Then they might
even provide helpful reminders, like “your teeth are one of the few parts of
your body you keep for your entire life.”
And of course, once you lose your teeth, they can never grow back.
Thirdly, toothbrushes cannot be
shared. I would never be able to
convince my friends to lend me a toothbrush, nor would I want them to (for
obvious reasons). My other dental care
products can be spared. I could probably
mooch off my friends a couple swigs of mouthwash, or even a few feet of
floss. So while my other dental care
products can be spared, having my own toothbrush is essential.
But lastly and most importantly, I
love my toothbrush. When it’s time to
replace my brush, I always insist that my parents buy the same model for me at
the local Asian market. It comes in
assorted colors, but I have had an off-white one for as long as I can remember.
At the edge of the handle is a translucent-orange cushiony grip, where it says
in Korean, “Ehl-Keeto.” No one,
including my parents, knows what this means. My dad thinks it is the name of an ancient martial
arts expert. My brother suggests that it
is referring to where it might have been made: Quito, the capitol of Ecuador. The owner of the Asian mart simply said it is
a typo the company never bothered to fix.
Whatever the case may be, to me, “Ehl-Keeto” signifies that it is my
toothbrush. I see toothbrushes that come
from big companies, like “Oral-B,” that claim to have a secret design that
enhances teeth cleaning. Some brushes
have colorful cartoons on them, like Donald Duck, or the Little Engine that
Could. My family owns a couple of those
electronic brushes that do almost all of the brushing for you. But I am convinced that no one has a more
exotic or exciting toothbrush than mine.
I wouldn’t keep my toothbrush just
because it has a useful purpose. Life
would certainly be a little more difficult without useful things such as my
computer, my school supplies or my refrigerator. But my most prized possessions are the ones
that help create my identity and make me unique – things like the
sticker-covered tag on my violin case, my owl alarm clock, or my “Sammy 2000”
hat. They are not simply sentimental
mementos. They remind me to be proud of
who I am, and not to be ashamed of being different. So while my toothbrush may not be straight
from Ecuador or be endorsed by a tae-kwon-do legend, I take much pride in the
fact that I am the only one with a strangely colored Korean toothbrush with a
bad typo. | | |
| Something that the young people in
today's literary, music, and art world have to deal with is the fact
that there is more media and more information than anyone can
process. The length of music produced in a year far exceeds the
actual length of a year, for example. There is so much pure
content out there that attempting to theorize culture and the arts can
be overwhelming. Foer writes out of this conundrum and at the
same time comments on September 11. He's young enough to have a
grasp on these issues, but he might be too young to get it right.
Un-deconstructing Foer
Oskar Schell, age nine, is a
quirky, frantic, boy genius – Calvin and
Hobbes in wit and precocity. Fake
business card reads: “Oskar Schell: inventor, jewelry designer, jewelry
fabricator, amateur entomologist, Francophile, vegan, origamist, pacifist,
percussionist, amateur astronomer, computer consultant, amateur archeologist,
collector of: rare coins, butterflies that died natural deaths, miniature
cacti, Beatles memorabilia, semiprecious stones, and other things.” When Oskar sees his child psychologist, he
tells him, “Right now I’m feeling sadness, happiness, anger, love, guilt, joy,
shame, and a little bit of humor.”
In the wake of September 11, 2001, the anticipated slew of
quick paraphernalia and literature was respectfully, or perhaps conveniently,
limited. After all, how do you begin to
convey the emotional effects of September
11, 2001? Do you make a
video documentary? Do you write it down,
bind it? Do you paint it? Are you even supposed to try?
How do you describe how Oskar feels
as a young boy who has lost his father?
Will a list of identities and emotions do?
Will a
novel do?
Jonathan Safran Foer deals with
this immense topic in his newest novel, which explores a deconstructionist
philosophy popular among new writers. Imperfect
words just aren’t enough – so throw in whatever the hell else counts as
writing. Devoid of the mystical shtetls
and oy gevalts of his first novel, Extremely
Loud and Incredibly Close contains photographs, colored ink, blank pages,
one-sentence pages, and a gut-wrenching, cheap-shop flip book at its end. If he could have, Foer might have used electronic
pages, complete with pop-up textures, and virtual reality.
Whether Foer is bored with conventional rhetoric
or just unable to create it, critics accuse him of the latter. But the question remains: how do you go about describing the anger,
madness, and loss after an event as dramatic as the destruction of the World
Trade Center?
Oskar spends much of his time
throwing around different solutions to this problem. As he sleuths his way
through New York, trying to find the owner of a mysterious key left behind by
his deceased father, he tries to make sense of why his father died and –
whether he is conscious of it or not –
why he feels the way he does. He daydreams
about special shower water that would cause his skin color to change according
to his mood. He invents a book that
contains every word in every language. “You could hold it and know that
everything you could possibly say was in your hands.” He thinks up ambulances with electronic signs
that automatically spell out the last thoughts of a dying patient.
This sort of emotional autism is
inherited from his grandfather, a mute, and a survivor of the Dresden
bombings of World War II. Oskar’s
grandfather exists in the book through letters, sprinkled in between Oskar’s
journey. He writes about his attempt to
make a telephone call. “I broke my life down into letters, for love I pressed
‘5,6,8,3’ for death, ‘3,3,2,8,4,’ when the suffering is subtracted from the
joy, what remains? What, I wondered, is
the sum of the life? “6,9,6,2,6,3,4….”
The numbers go on for a full, desperate, two pages. The implicit question: can life be quantified? And are words any different? Oskar’s grandfather’s letters often run over
fifteen pages, yet it still isn’t enough, and he keeps “running out of
room.” The lines on the page literally
get closer and closer together, until the words are an illegible black
scribble.
Okay, so
maybe it’s a bit annoying, and we get the point. Yet it is precisely Oskar and his
grandfather's inability to express themselves properly that makes their stories
more poignant, more agonizing. With the
same virtuosity that swelled in his first novel, Foer elicits a cathartic spew
of emotions, in whatever way is appropriate. With Oskar, it’s writing in all
caps. It’s obsessively mulling over his
last words to his father. “‘Dad?’ ‘Yeah
buddy?’ ‘Nothing.’” For Oskar’s
grandfather, it’s using note cards (one-word pages) and recycling phrases like,
“And I wouldn’t say no to something sweet,” and “I’m sorry.” Forget for a moment that Foer uses
fill-in-the-blank passages, photo illustrations, and flip books, or anything else
that some would consider cheating. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
feels like what the title suggests – it makes you laugh, squint, and
grimace. By the end, I was moved to
tears when I learned that Oskar could have talked to his father one last time
before he died – but was frozen in front of the answering machine, unable to find
words, unable to pick up just before the towers went down.
Foer’s attempt
is both earnest and courageous, showing that more isn’t necessarily less. This makes him every young writer’s champion;
he avoids straight prose, employs gimmicks for cheap, doodles on the page, and
all the while succeeds tremendously. And
if you’re not a believer in Foer’s new inventions, Oskar’s colored water
invention is something to consider: “It
would be a good invention...[because] many times…you know you’re feeling a lot
of something, but you don’t know what that something is…But with the special
water, you could look at your orange hands and think, I’m happy! That whole
time I was actually happy! What a relief!”
If there is a more brutally honest, earnest, and moving attempt at
harnessing the emotions and the realities of September 11, I have yet to see
it. | | |
|