| | Something that the young people in
today's literary, music, and art world have to deal with is the fact
that there is more media and more information than anyone can
process. The length of music produced in a year far exceeds the
actual length of a year, for example. There is so much pure
content out there that attempting to theorize culture and the arts can
be overwhelming. Foer writes out of this conundrum and at the
same time comments on September 11. He's young enough to have a
grasp on these issues, but he might be too young to get it right.
Un-deconstructing Foer
Oskar Schell, age nine, is a
quirky, frantic, boy genius – Calvin and
Hobbes in wit and precocity. Fake
business card reads: “Oskar Schell: inventor, jewelry designer, jewelry
fabricator, amateur entomologist, Francophile, vegan, origamist, pacifist,
percussionist, amateur astronomer, computer consultant, amateur archeologist,
collector of: rare coins, butterflies that died natural deaths, miniature
cacti, Beatles memorabilia, semiprecious stones, and other things.” When Oskar sees his child psychologist, he
tells him, “Right now I’m feeling sadness, happiness, anger, love, guilt, joy,
shame, and a little bit of humor.”
In the wake of September 11, 2001, the anticipated slew of
quick paraphernalia and literature was respectfully, or perhaps conveniently,
limited. After all, how do you begin to
convey the emotional effects of September
11, 2001? Do you make a
video documentary? Do you write it down,
bind it? Do you paint it? Are you even supposed to try?
How do you describe how Oskar feels
as a young boy who has lost his father?
Will a list of identities and emotions do?
Will a
novel do?
Jonathan Safran Foer deals with
this immense topic in his newest novel, which explores a deconstructionist
philosophy popular among new writers. Imperfect
words just aren’t enough – so throw in whatever the hell else counts as
writing. Devoid of the mystical shtetls
and oy gevalts of his first novel, Extremely
Loud and Incredibly Close contains photographs, colored ink, blank pages,
one-sentence pages, and a gut-wrenching, cheap-shop flip book at its end. If he could have, Foer might have used electronic
pages, complete with pop-up textures, and virtual reality.
Whether Foer is bored with conventional rhetoric
or just unable to create it, critics accuse him of the latter. But the question remains: how do you go about describing the anger,
madness, and loss after an event as dramatic as the destruction of the World
Trade Center?
Oskar spends much of his time
throwing around different solutions to this problem. As he sleuths his way
through New York, trying to find the owner of a mysterious key left behind by
his deceased father, he tries to make sense of why his father died and –
whether he is conscious of it or not –
why he feels the way he does. He daydreams
about special shower water that would cause his skin color to change according
to his mood. He invents a book that
contains every word in every language. “You could hold it and know that
everything you could possibly say was in your hands.” He thinks up ambulances with electronic signs
that automatically spell out the last thoughts of a dying patient.
This sort of emotional autism is
inherited from his grandfather, a mute, and a survivor of the Dresden
bombings of World War II. Oskar’s
grandfather exists in the book through letters, sprinkled in between Oskar’s
journey. He writes about his attempt to
make a telephone call. “I broke my life down into letters, for love I pressed
‘5,6,8,3’ for death, ‘3,3,2,8,4,’ when the suffering is subtracted from the
joy, what remains? What, I wondered, is
the sum of the life? “6,9,6,2,6,3,4….”
The numbers go on for a full, desperate, two pages. The implicit question: can life be quantified? And are words any different? Oskar’s grandfather’s letters often run over
fifteen pages, yet it still isn’t enough, and he keeps “running out of
room.” The lines on the page literally
get closer and closer together, until the words are an illegible black
scribble.
Okay, so
maybe it’s a bit annoying, and we get the point. Yet it is precisely Oskar and his
grandfather's inability to express themselves properly that makes their stories
more poignant, more agonizing. With the
same virtuosity that swelled in his first novel, Foer elicits a cathartic spew
of emotions, in whatever way is appropriate. With Oskar, it’s writing in all
caps. It’s obsessively mulling over his
last words to his father. “‘Dad?’ ‘Yeah
buddy?’ ‘Nothing.’” For Oskar’s
grandfather, it’s using note cards (one-word pages) and recycling phrases like,
“And I wouldn’t say no to something sweet,” and “I’m sorry.” Forget for a moment that Foer uses
fill-in-the-blank passages, photo illustrations, and flip books, or anything else
that some would consider cheating. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
feels like what the title suggests – it makes you laugh, squint, and
grimace. By the end, I was moved to
tears when I learned that Oskar could have talked to his father one last time
before he died – but was frozen in front of the answering machine, unable to find
words, unable to pick up just before the towers went down.
Foer’s attempt
is both earnest and courageous, showing that more isn’t necessarily less. This makes him every young writer’s champion;
he avoids straight prose, employs gimmicks for cheap, doodles on the page, and
all the while succeeds tremendously. And
if you’re not a believer in Foer’s new inventions, Oskar’s colored water
invention is something to consider: “It
would be a good invention...[because] many times…you know you’re feeling a lot
of something, but you don’t know what that something is…But with the special
water, you could look at your orange hands and think, I’m happy! That whole
time I was actually happy! What a relief!”
If there is a more brutally honest, earnest, and moving attempt at
harnessing the emotions and the realities of September 11, I have yet to see
it. |